If you send out a 3 day notice to pay rent or leave and the tenant tenders the full amount of rent demanded in the notice and it is accepted by the landlord within the 3 day notice period then this cures the default and extinguishes the rental obligation.
The tenant’s performance within the 3-day period also nullifies any declaration of forfeiture in the notice. CCP §1161.5. Therefore, if the tenant pays the rent due within the notice period it also eliminates your ability to terminate and evict the tenant.
To extinguish the rent obligation, the tenant must actually pay the amount due, or (under Civil Code §1500) deposit it in a bank account in the landlord’s name and give the landlord notice of the deposit. A deposit in accordance with the provisions of CC §1500 is not a mere “tender” of rent, but actual performance that discharges the obligation. Walker v Houston (1932).
Payment of the rent demanded in a 3-day notice within the 3 days nullifies any declaration of forfeiture in the notice. CCP §1161.5.
Although a tender of rent refused by the landlord and not deposited in a bank to the landlord’s credit does not extinguish the rental obligation, it does ensure that the tenant has not breached the covenant to pay rent. Randol v Tatum (1893) 98 C 390, 398, 33 P 433. See also Walker v Houston (1932) 215 C 742, 745, 12 P2d 952.
Thus, although the landlord may still maintain an action for rent, the tender protects the tenant against an unlawful detainer action based on breach of the covenant to pay rent. An unaccepted tender is also sufficient to terminate the incidents of the tenant’s obligation to pay rent under the lease or rental agreement (e.g., interest, attorney fees, costs). CC §1504. Holland v Paddock (1956).
A tenant who defeats an unlawful detainer action by proving tender of the rent, and who deposits the rent into court, might recover attorney fees under CC §1717(b)(2).
Although the general rule is that a creditor may refuse a tender made by check rather than in cash, if the mode of payment during the lease has been by check, then a tender by check is proper unless the tenant has been notified otherwise. Strom v Union Oil Co. (1948).